From Innovation to Ethics: Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Legislative
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The use of LLM to generate legal texts presents both opportunities and risks. By examining white-box models, model explainability, target audiences, and alternative scenarios, we can identify the technical and strategic considerations necessary for their ethical use by respecting equal treatment, truthfulness, privacy, responsibility and legality. This analysis informs a proposed strategy for leveraging generative artificial intelligence in legislative contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
How to Cite
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
© Asamblea de Madrid. Los originales publicados son propiedad de la Asamblea de Madrid, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
References
Bordt, S.; Finck, M.; Raidl, E., and Luxburg von, U. (2022) Post-hoc explanations fail to achieve their purpose in adversarial contexts in (ACM 2022) FAccT ’22 891.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2021). Ética de la inteligencia artificial. Madrid: Cátedra.
Coglianese, Cary and Crum, Colton R., Taking Training Seriously: Human Guidance and Management-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence (February 15, 2024). U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper N.o 24-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4729072
Dahl, M.; Magesh, V.; Suzgun, M. y Ho, D. (2024) Hallucinating Law: Large Legal Fictions: Profiling Legal Hallucinations in Large Language Models, en https://hai.stanford.edu/news/hallucinating-law-legal-mistakes-large-language-models-are-pervasive
De Alba Bastarrechea, E. (2025). La inteligencia artificial en la transformación digital de los Parlamentos: en busca de un modelo ad hoc de gobernanza. Asamblea. Revista Parlamentaria de la Asamblea de Madrid, n.º 48, 161–193.
Fitsilis, F.; Koryzis, D.; Schefbeck, G. Legal Informatics Tools for Evidence-Based Policy Creation in Parliaments. Int. J. Parliam. Stud. 2022, 2, 1–25.
Guillem Carrau, J. (2024). Inteligencia artificial y Parlamentos modernos en Corts: Anuario de derecho parlamentario, ISSN 1136-3339, n.º 38, 77-114.
Inter-parliamentary Union (2024): Guides for AI in parliaments en https://www.ipu.org/ai-guidelines
Kouroutakis, A. (2024). Rule of law in the AI era: addressing accountability, and the digital divide. Discov Artif Intell 4, 115.
Loyola-González O. Black-box vs. white-box: understanding their advantages and weaknesses from a practical point of view. IEEE Access. 2019;7:154096–113.
Miller, T. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artif Intell. 2019;267:1–38.
Montoya, D. y Rummery, A.: The use of artificial intelligence by government: parliamentary and legal issues, E-brief n.º 02/2020, Parliament of South Wales, en https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/researchpapers/Pages/The-use-of-AI-by-government-parliamentary-and-legal-issues.aspx
US Congress (2025): Regulating Artificial Intelligence: U.S. and International Approaches and Considerations for Congress June 4, 2025 Congressional Research Service, en https://crsreports.congress.gov R48555